ARE WE THERE YET?

ARE WE THERE YET?
2 1/2 days until EE (exit experience)

Sunday, July 8, 2007

It is countdown time for me now...


It is Sunday July 8th 2007 and I am meeting my group tomorrow to go over our strategy, thoughts, reflections, layout of what we have accomplished this past year and a half. Honestly? I am scared. I can't even get my head around what we have learned--it has been so much. I have never worked this hard for anything in my life and had so much fun doing it. I am waiting for the day that Bill (aka Dr. Warrick) has been telling us about. It will happen about six months from now. I will be sitting there doing my lesson plans and BOOM it will hit me! All the stuff Vygotsky taught us and Pink will come flooding in and I will see clearly all that we have been working on. Ahhhh, I wait with baited breath. Back to my ellusive activities....

Sunday, June 24, 2007

June 23rd

I wrote this post on June 11th, where I posted two times. Maybe it was missed...then again maybe not.. I would love to have your thoughts from your experiences and how you have dealt with these issues. So....I am posting again.

I wonder if it is a better idea to blog often or blog long.... Tonight I will blog long since I have had four days to reflect on our class last Wednesday. The intense storms on Friday evening kept me off line and I had time to do some reading. This in turn prompted many diverse connections in my head about how all this is connected; The TLA course, the new technologies we are learning about, the group work we are experiencing with our advocacy. New understandings have surfaced this week. In reading Davidson's case study on developing the role for an Educational Technologist (ET) I am transported to previous conversations I have had with our school's ITRT (Instructional Technology Resource Teacher). The issues that were faced by Davidson's subject Kevin McGullivray mirror issues that our ITRT and I discuss. "What is my role?", "How is it defined by the teachers and the administration?", "How can I get teachers to make use of my talents?", "How will others view me as part of this school if I do not have my own office space?" and "How can I get the school team to support my efforts?" are questions often discussed. It was very helpful to read this study in that it helped me legitimize what might be construed as complaining by our ITRT. Defining her role is critical--how teachers view her position and her role in the school is equally important to her effectiveness as a technology guru, as is how she views the role herself. With all the emerging technology and the integration desired by the school officials it is imperative that she is seen as a comrade, a liaison, a co-teacher, and a collaborator. What I have realized is hat this all takes time an doesn't happen during the first year. The second year is better. People need time to internalize change and process what it means to and for them. Teachers roles, themselves, have changed--we have been required to adjust to changing curriculum, standardized testing, ever-widening leadership roles and continually asked to incorporate new technology. There doesn't seem to be the luxury of the process time needed to easily incorporate all these changes. I can sometimes comfortably sit back and look at the big picture. It is not productive to view a week's, a month's, or even a quarter's progress or lack there of, to determine success or failure. Brown and Moffet's discussion of the hero's role is apropos--it is not enough to look linearly at cause and effect....sometimes the seeds we place take time to grow.

Thursday, June 21, 2007

June 19th reflection

I am really enjoying this semester. I am learning so much and know that I will miss this when it is over. I need the forced participation and love the energy that our cohort has.

We finished up a lot of work on Tuesday and it felt nice to really work together as a group. In the beginning of this cohort Dr. Warrick would change our groups as often as we met. I kept getting thrown out of my comfort zone and have really learned the value of that. When I chose to work with Joe and Marc I chose mostly unknown personalities. I had worked briefly with them on one project before but never together. I have very much enjoyed how we have meshed all of our talents. Through the past year and a half we have learned to trust ourselves and others in the group. This was important for me because in the beginning I felt I was so new to this and now I see my confidence has grown by leaps.

I looked at all the stuff we had to do Tuesday and honestly did not feel overwhelmed. I trusted my group and new that we could tackle it. That was an awesome experience. I know this is what I will feel during the exit experience. At least I hope so. Our group is strong.

I love the whole idea of a podcast to streamline to just the basics. It reminds me of our 25 word Happy Hour Summary--short and to the point. I can see the use of these in class, too and look forward to next year implementing what we have learned.

I talked with my department chair (trying to step into the extra large shoes of a teacher leader) and had a surprisingly great conversation. We talked about having a geometry, and Algebra retreat, at the end of this summer for the teachers in our department. I am going to have a department get-together at the end of July. Any ideas for activities for these two events are greatly appreciated and welcome. The door has been opened and there are willing allies, it is time to move in. Thanks to everyone for what they have shared with me and helped me to become a better person.

Saturday, June 16, 2007

June 14th reflection--Bulk of the PSA

Thursday night was so much fun. Joe and I had to do our PSA together. We had the storyboard completed and ran into a glitch when some footage that Joe had taken did not come out. What to do, what to do? We discussed several options, one of which consisted of meeting outside of class to use the actors we had previously selected, and we finally came to the conclusion that the project was not how well the acting was but how we put together the announcement, was the message portrayed as we wanted and could we edit it so that it all came together in an effective PSA. I enjoyed this whole process. Coming up to the roadblocks, rerouting our intentions, changing our path was...well...liberating for me. I get stuck sometimes with activities and miss the opportunities to try them in a new way. Thanks to Josh and Cheryl who came to our aid and did a great acting job for us. Joe was a great director. It was so much fun to play with it afterwards and see how detailed you could be with the time frame, and how you could add the transitions and the voiceovers. The saving of it was a little stressful but with Dr. Warrick's help that was accomplished successfully. I, too, am looking forward to everyones finished project on Tuesday. Happy Weekend.

Thursday, June 14, 2007

June 12th reflection

Tuesdays night class was very enjoyable. I liked working on the PSA (Public Service Announcement). I thought the video clip with Katie Couric was fascinating. I was totally enthralled in the amount of work that goes into a 30 second PSA. She certainly demonstrated on a much larger level what we are reading about how teacher leaders should behave. Looking and seeing a job that needs to be done and advocating for it. She was instrumental in getting those three commercials produced but was by no means the most important of the group. At our schools the importance of the teacher leaders goes without saying but I think we sometimes lose hope thinking that we have no power and that what we do doesn't matter. Couric's role was empowering for me to see.
I look forward to the filming and the editing of our PSA for ITS for Motivation. We worked on the treatment and the story board and are ready to film. I enjoyed the back and forth discussions on the importance of the right word choice and what message exactly did we want to portray. The dialogue and the unspoken expressions all need to say what we want.

Sunday, June 10, 2007

I altered my choice...posts that are too long, are just that.
I wanted to share my experience with two teachers this past week. I have been doubting my ability to be in a leadership role at my school. There seems to be so many other teachers that are smarter than I, have more experience than I, have the ability to articulate what needs to be articulated....but this week I may have found what I do do well, and that is sharing what I love to do. I started my end of year wiki with my last class of the year (check it out coopsgeometry.pbwiki.com) and showed it to another teacher in my department and she now has her own started for next year. She does so much more techy stuff than I have ever done so I didn't need to help her much but in the coming months I think she will be a great advocate partner for implementing more of this type of technology. The other teacher I had fun with is in the English department and I went to her in search of a donut. Yes, food brought me to the right place at the right time. I asked her how she was doing--an innocent question--and she held up the "goal sheet" and said she was stuck on what to put. She wanted to incorporate more technology like doing a web page but was told by others that we all had to do that next year and she was now stumped on what angle to shoot for. I showed her my Wiki and my blog (this one) and answered her excited questions about the pros and cons of each. We discussed backgrounds, layouts possibilities, limited access, editable content--it was very exciting and she was thankful to have the help. She had not gotten much this past year. I realized that it is unfair to say that the teachers that have not incorporated techno-stuff are resistant. There just may not be help available when they are asking for it. I left her with ideas that i could see buzzing in her head and the URLs of the sites to get started. It was fun and I even got my donut!

June 11th

I wonder if it is a better idea to blog often or blog long....
Tonight I will blog long since I have had four days to reflect on our class last Wednesday. The intense storms on Friday evening kept me off line and I had time to do some reading. This in turn prompted many diverse connections in my head about how all this is connected; The TLA course, the new technologies we are learning about, the group work we are experiencing with our advocacy. New understandings have surfaced this week. In reading Davidson's case study on developing the role for an Educational Technologist (ET) I am transported to previous conversations I have had with our school's ITRT (Instructional Technology Resource Teacher). The issues that were faced by Davidson's subject Kevin McGullivray mirror issues that our ITRT and I discuss. "What is my role?", "How is it defined by the teachers and the administration?", "How can I get teachers to make use of my talents?", "How will others view me as part of this school if I do not have my own office space?" and "How can I get the school team to support my efforts?" are questions often discussed. It was very helpful to read this study in that it helped me legitimize what might be construed as complaining by our ITRT. Defining her role is critical--how teachers view her position and her role in the school is equally important to her effectiveness as a technology guru, as is how she views the role herself. With all the emerging technology and the integration desired by the school officials it is imperative that she is seen as a comrade, a liaison, a co-teacher, and a collaborator. What I have realized is hat this all takes time an doesn't happen during the first year. The second year is better. People need time to internalize change and process what it means to and for them. Teachers roles, themselves, have changed--we have been required to adjust to changing curriculum, standardized testing, ever-widening leadership roles and continually asked to incorporate new technology. There doesn't seem to be the luxury of the process time needed to easily incorporate all these changes. I can sometimes comfortably sit back and look at the big picture. It is not productive to view a week's, a month's, or even a quarter's progress or lack there of, to determine success or failure. Brown and Moffet's discussion of the hero's role is apropos--it is not enough to look linearly at cause and effect....sometimes the seeds we place take time to grow.